High Court rules searches targeting Andrew unlawful, but investigation continues2026-10-07The High Court in London ruled that the search warrants and seizures were unlawful because of an error in their issuance.Thames Valley Police is continuing its investigation and seeking a legal way to retain the seized items.Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor opposes the retention of the evidence; a closed hearing is expected no earlier than 2027.Andrew remains under investigation for alleged misconduct in public office; he has not been charged and denies any wrongdoing related to Epstein.Affaire Epstein : les perquisitions liées à l’arrestation du prince Andrew jugées illégales (Sud Ouest)"Une erreur significative a été commise": les perquisitions liées à l'arrestation d'Andrew jugées illégales (BFMTV)Search warrants for former prince Andrew's homes were unlawful, UK court rules (France 24)Affaire Epstein : les perquisitions liées à l’arrestation de l’ex-prince Andrew étaient illégales, reconnaît la police britannique (Le Monde)Ex-prince Andrew warrants ruled 'unlawful' as police investigation continues (Euronews)Affaire Epstein: l'ex-prince Andrew conteste en justice des perquisitions menées chez lui en février (BFMTV)Judge says search warrants used to seize property from former Prince Andrew were unlawful (Los Angeles Times)Former Prince Andrew's historic police showdown could put seized evidence in jeopardy: expert (Fox News)